Andrew Currie
Source of wealth: Chemicals
...
...
Modules
Biography
Andrew Currie has been a director at $68 billion (2022 revenue) chemicals giant Ineos since 1999, a year after the company was founded by fellow billionaire James Ratcliffe.
The Cambridge University natural sciences grad started his career at BP Chemicals, spending 15 years in technical and managerial roles.
He later became a director at Inspec Group, the former parent company of Ineos, until it was acquired by another chemical company in 1998.
It's become one of the U.K. shale sector's largest players. Its 600-foot "Dragon Ships" were the first to transport U.S. shale gas into Europe.
Ineos acquired two chemicals businesses from BP in 2021 for $5 billion. It formed petrochemical JVs with Sinopec worth more than $7 billion in 2022.
In 2023, Ineos acquired $1.4 billion of U.S. onshore oil and gas assets from Chesapeake Energy. Currie derives his fortune from his minority stake in Ineos.
Financial Assets
Financial assets information not available.
The Great Lie of Mega-Fortunes: The Case of Andrew Currie
Billionaires are often presented under the romantic myth of the 'self-made person': a narrative designed to justify opulence as the natural reward for hard work, effort, or ingenuity. However, when confronting such extreme volumes of wealth with macroeconomic reality, the meritocracy narrative completely breaks down. No individual can legitimately generate through personal effort a fortune equivalent to millions of times the average working-class salary. Capital at the top does not grow because of exceptional talent; it expands through an implacable dynamic where accumulated money works exponentially faster than people, devouring the wealth generated by productive labor.
The immense fortune of Andrew Currie, linked to Manufacturing and 'Chemicals', has not been built in a free-market vacuum, but through rent-seeking, the use of exclusive elite influence, the consolidation of monopoly positions, or inherited wealth. Far from taking real private risks, billionaire empires structurally depend on state support through direct subsidies, infrastructure use, exploitation of R&D, public contracts, and offshore tax engineering. While this wealth is equivalent to the physical weight of 43 tons of pure gold, the rest of the planet suffers from an artificial scarcity of basic resources. The fact that this wealth is enough to fully fund the public health system of DR Congo, a country with more than 105800000 million inhabitants for 2.7 years, proves that unlimited accumulation is not an entrepreneurial achievement, but the hijacking of democratic sovereignty.